Mr. J. Collard Date: .
CLU3AO
Peer Evaluation
Presenter(s): , . Total Marks: /40
Evaluator: .
Instructions: Place a check in the box on each row that most exemplifies the presentation. At the bottom of each column place the total number of points awarded
according to the marks awarded. Add up the totals and place them in the square adjacent to the student name(s). If you are evaluating two students at
once, you may award two separate marks.
Scale |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
Criteria |
||||
Preparation |
- It is obvious that the student did a great deal of work to prepare. Nothing read. |
- More than an average amount of work was done to get ready. Very little read. |
- an average amount of work was done to prepare, some reading |
- The presenter was prepared. Far too much reading. |
Organization |
- Well organized and ready to handle any eventuality. |
- Presentation is good but could be better with more attention to detail. |
- Presentation is fair, student was unfortunately sidetracked. |
- The presentation was lacking and poorly organized. |
Voice |
- Excellent voice, good tone and modulation. Pace was excellent. |
- most words were clearly spoken but some were hard to understand. |
- little change of pace with regard to voice modulation or speed. |
- much of the presentation was lost due to poor speaking skills. |
Audio/Visual |
- Audio visual aids added measurably to my understanding to the material. |
-The use of aids was good but not great. |
- Aids were used but did not really add to the presentation. A wider application would have helped. |
- Use of aids were lacking and would have added to the presentation. |
Poster X2 |
- It is obvious by the presentation that the student is able to use the system seamlessly. |
- The use of the media was good but not great. A need to rehearse more is obvious. |
- There were obvious glitches that could have been better with more effort. |
- The student is still uncomfortable with the media. |
Audience |
- was totally involved and asked many questions. |
- was interested and seemed pleased with the presentation. Some questions were asked. |
- liked the presentation but some parts were lackluster |
- was not into the presentation and asked few questions. |
Responses |
- every question was answered with complete skill and each answer was germane to the work. |
- questions were well handled but not all answers pertained to the work. |
- answers were good but too short to really add to the presentation. |
- answers did not lead to more understanding of the topic. Too many yes or no answers. |
Information |
- was extremely relevant to our class discussions and society in general. |
-was relevant to class work and has some application in society. |
- was interesting but somewhat dated. |
- was not relevant to our class and needs to apply more closely to society. |
Value |
- was extremely valuable and I learned a great deal of information I did not previously know. |
- was valuable and I learned some information that I found of worth. |
- was of value but I knew much of the information already. |
- was not of value since I did not really learn any new information. |
Total: |
|
|
|
|
Comments: